A few months ago my 72-year-old mother told me she was having a CT scan because she had a lot of back pain. Her doctor thought it was a bulging disc. Given her age, it was most likely related to degenerative disc disease, i.e., old age. He had already prescribed physical therapy and some anti-inflammatories.
So why, I asked her, are you having a CT scan? How would your doctor’s treatment plan change based on what the CT shows? Are you going to have surgery? Take stronger drugs?
She couldn’t answer. She couldn’t answer because she never asked the questions. Just as she never asks her doctors why they prescribe one medication over another, or why they recommend knee arthroscopy for her aching joint (which studies find no more effective than conservative medical treatment) instead of knee replacement (which studies find extremely effective both from a medical and a cost perspective because it keeps keep older people active, reducing the risk of additional medical problems and improving their quality of life).
Now, this is not to pick on my mother (who, since she reads this blog, is probably preparing to cancel her upcoming trip to see me). It’s to point out a major problem with too many people in this country, particularly those, ahem, of a certain age (read: Medicare beneficiaries).
Like my mother, they were raised during a time in which you never questioned your doctor. When he (and most doctors of the time were men) said swallow these pills, you said “how many?” When he said you need surgery, you said “when?” When he sent you for x-rays, CT scan, MRI — you went. Why worry about it when you had good health insurance and your out of pocket expenses were just a few dollars. After all, these are just tests, they’re not going to hurt you, are they?
In fact, the release of two major studies this week showed just how much they can hurt you. Both were published in the Archives of Internal Medicine and both looked the contribution of CT scans–those seemingly benign fancy x-rays that provide your doctors with three-dimensional images of parts of your body–to cancer. We like these scans; last year, Americans received 70 million of them!
- CT scans performed in 2007 will be responsible for an additional 29,000 cancers and 15,000 cancer-related deaths.
- The younger you are when you get a scan, the greater your risk of developing cancer from it. For instance, a 40-year-old woman has a one-in-270 risk of developing cancer from a coronary angiogram (a test to evaluate coronary artery blockages that exposes you to as much radiation as 309 chest x-rays), while 20-year-old woman has a one-in-150 chance.
- Radiation dosages from CTs vary widely among hospitals, even for the same type of scan.
- Patients are exposed to radiation dosages that are, on average, four times higher than necessary.
What does this mean for you? It means that, unlike my mother, you should not blindly head to the radiology department whenever your doctor hands you a prescription for a CT (or MRI or any other test). Nor should you take yourself to those freestanding centers that offer full-body CTs.
Even if the test itself doesn’t carry any risk, it still costs money. Or could lead to unnecessary biopsies and worries. Or could identify something that, if you hadn’t known was there, wouldn’t have killed you but will now subject you to treatments that could.
This is not to say that imaging tests aren’t necessary. They are a very important part of good medical care. However, researchers estimate that at least a third of all CTs are unnecessary. Plus, as an editorial in the same issue of the Archives pointed out, a GAO report on medical imaging found significant differences in expenditures on medical imaging between states, with no evidence that people getting more scans fared better medically than those getting fewer. Another study found that nearly four out of 10 scans ordered for heart conditions were inappropriate or, most likely, not needed.
So the next time you think about asking for a CT, or your doctor wants you to get one, ask the question: “Why?” Will it change the treatment plan? Are there other diagnostic options? What are you looking for?
If you and your doctor decide that yes, you do need the scan, when you get to the radiology department ask those same questions. Turns out that doctors often order one test when another would work much better at delivering the information they need–possibly with less risk.
This is the kind of thing that managed care used to do back in the heyday of HMOs. Doctor ordered an MRI or CT scan? They usually had to get authorization from a nurse or other medical professional first. Back then, of course, everyone screamed about rationing. So the practice, like most that managed care instituted to reign in runaway costs, went the way of the horse and buggy.
Rationing? Maybe. But wouldn’t you rather be refused a CT scan today than get a scan-related cancer tomorrow?
2 Responses to “Why You Should Ration Your Healthcare”
I always suspected this! It seems like doctors (and dentists and chiropractors)want to give us more and more radiation all the time. I think that we should have some sort of radiation chart, similar to the list of drugs we should carry around with us to avoid drug interactions. Whenever a doc does an MRI, CT scan, X ray or whatever, the doc writes it on the chart and once you are over a certain amount of radiation for the year, you're done. No more looking inside your body for reasons that are not all that important to begin with.
I refused an MRI a while back when I went to a PT for back pain. He kept trying and trying to talk me into getting one and I kept saying, “Look, would it change your treatment plan? I'm not going to have surgery no matter what it finds, so what's the point?” But the industry is not really set up for that kind of assertiveness.
Fascinating…and I know you do your research. Definitely something to keep in mind when being your own health advocate!